Scio.ly LogoScio.ly
PracticeDashboardTeamsAnalytics

On this page

Edit
  • Overview
  • Motion modeling
  • Braking systems
  • Alignment and chassis
  • Calibration
  • Worked micro‑examples
  • Pitfalls
  • Practice prompts
  • References

Scrambler

2026 season

Type: Build
Divisions: B
Participants: Up to 2
Approx. Time: 50 minutes
Allowed Resources: Device and tools per build rules; eye protection; impound as applicable.

Overview

Scrambler devices transport an egg to a target quickly and accurately without breakage. Performance hinges on controllable acceleration, precise braking, and straight‑line alignment.

Motion modeling

  • Kinematics: stopping distance depends on pre‑brake speed and brake deceleration; reduce speed variance to stabilize stop distance.
  • Energy budget: gravitational/elastic energy → translational + losses (rolling resistance, aerodynamic drag negligible at low speeds). Consistency beats peak speed.

Braking systems

  • Friction brakes: pads on wheels/drums; sensitive to surface and wear; adjustability is key.
  • Mechanical stops: string wraps, cams, screw stops; robust but require careful calibration.
  • Ramps/wedges: convert forward motion into lifting work; more tolerant to small speed changes; ensure repeatable geometry.

Alignment and chassis

  • Wheel alignment: toe and camber near zero; matched diameters; stiff chassis to prevent torsion under load.
  • Mass distribution: lower CG to prevent tipping during braking; symmetric layout reduces yaw bias.
  • Guidance: rails vs free‑running; if free, use longer wheelbase and track width for stability.

Calibration

  • Distance tables: command vs measured distance across temperatures/surfaces; interpolate near target; bracket target distances.
  • Pre‑run checks: wheel cleanliness, brake reset, starting position and angle; battery/rubber condition if applicable.

Worked micro‑examples

  1. Brake linearization
  • If friction brake decel varies with speed, pre‑slow before brake engage using a mild drag to reduce variance at the final brake.
  1. Wheel mismatch
  • 1% diameter difference across wheels causes curved path; compensate with slight toe or by matching wheels within tighter tolerance.
  1. Ramp stop sensitivity
  • Raising ramp angle slightly increases vertical work; tune to widen the tolerance band for final stop distance stability.

Pitfalls

  • Over‑optimized for speed with fragile braking repeatability.
  • Calibrating on one surface only; ignoring temperature/humidity effects.
  • Sloppy starting alignment; inconsistent release forces.

Practice prompts

  • Compare the repeatability of a friction brake vs ramp stop using 10 trials each and analyze variance.
  • Design a toe measurement method with simple tools and specify acceptable tolerances.
  • Build a distance interpolation method from a calibration table and validate against new targets.

References

  • SciOly Wiki – Scrambler: https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/Scrambler

Official references

  • SciOly Wiki
  • 2026 Event Table (SOINC)

Sample notesheet

Download a printable, rule-compliant sample notesheet. Customize with your notes.

Study roadmap

  1. Step 1
  2. Step 2
  3. Step 3
Contribute edits