Scio.ly LogoScio.ly
PracticeDashboardTeamsAnalytics

On this page

Edit
  • Overview
  • Writer strategies
  • Builder strategies
  • Notation toolkit (suggested)
  • Common failure modes and fixes
  • Worked micro‑examples
  • Practice prompts
  • Pitfalls
  • References

Write It Do It

2026 season

Type: Study
Divisions: B
Participants: Up to 2
Approx. Time: 50 minutes
Allowed Resources: No external resources. Paper and writing instruments typically provided.

Overview

Write It Do It tests precise technical communication: one partner writes an instruction set for a model; the other reconstructs it without seeing the original. Performance depends on standardized notation, spatial references, and ambiguity control.

Writer strategies

  • Global frame: define a fixed reference (front/back/left/right), orientation (x/y/z), and naming scheme for parts (e.g., BRICK‑2x4‑RED = B24R).
  • Inventory: count and list parts with quantities before writing; note duplicates and unique features (studs, holes, colors, lengths).
  • Step structure: use short, numbered steps; one action per step; order steps from stable base to details; avoid backtracking.
  • Phrasing: avoid vague terms ("a little"); specify positions ("attach centered on the long edge, studs facing up"); use consistent units and counts (studs/holes/pegs).
  • Modularity: define subassemblies with names; re‑use references ("attach SUB‑A to SUB‑B at…").
  • Error traps: explicitly state symmetry or lack thereof; warn about similar parts ("choose the shorter of the two blue rods").

Builder strategies

  • Pre‑read: scan entire instruction set; lay out parts by category and color; stage subassemblies.
  • Parse and confirm: mark completed steps, annotate uncertain phrases, maintain orientation consistently; re‑check counts after each module.
  • Stability first: prioritize steps that lock geometry; brace assemblies before handling.

Notation toolkit (suggested)

  • Parts: [NAME]=[TYPE][SIZE][COLOR] (e.g., P1=B24R); provide a legend at top.
  • Orientation: +x right, +y forward, +z up relative to base; rotations in 90° increments unless stated.
  • Placement: (offset_x, offset_y, offset_z) in studs/holes/units from a defined origin corner.
  • Repetition: "Repeat step 7 mirrored across x‑axis"; "Repeat ×4 around z‑axis at 90° increments".
  • Clock: Pin at 2:00.

Common failure modes and fixes

  • Ambiguous reference frames → always define front and origin; keep constant.
  • Similar parts confusion → preface with a parts key and distinguishing features.
  • Large steps with multiple actions → split into atomic steps.
  • Unstable partial builds → re‑order steps to create a stable base earlier.

Worked micro‑examples

  1. Symmetry callout
  • "Place two B24R parallel, studs up, long edges along +y at offsets (0,0,0) and (0,4,0). Bridge with a B26B centered at y=2." This eliminates mirroring ambiguity.
  1. Rotation clarity
  • "Rotate SUB‑A 90° about +z (clockwise when viewed from +z) before attachment."
  1. Counting studs
  • "Attach P3 so its left edge is 1 stud from the −x edge and centered along +y; 4 studs remain visible on each exposed short edge."

Practice prompts

  • Write a 15‑step instruction set for a 10–15 piece model with at least one rotation and one mirror.
  • Convert a poorly written set into precise, stepwise instructions; list each ambiguity you removed.
  • As builder, annotate the minimal set of clarifications that would have eliminated your errors.

Pitfalls

  • Failing to lock orientation terms; oscillating between color/shape terms without part codes; omitting counts.

References

  • SciOly Wiki – Write It Do It: https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/Write_It,_Do_It

Official references

  • SciOly Wiki
  • 2026 Event Table (SOINC)

Sample notesheet

Download a printable, rule-compliant sample notesheet. Customize with your notes.

Contribute edits